Comparison

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co (ADM) vs Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL)

The same filed metrics for both companies, side by side.

What each names as a risk in its own annual report, how each is priced against its own history, and the tracked managers whose latest 13F reports a position in both.

Financials

ADM

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co

Farm Products

Revenue, FY26: $80.27B
Net income: $1.08B
Operating cash flow: $5.45B
Free cash flow: $4.2B
Net margin: 1.34%
Operating margin: -
Gross margin: 6.27%

VITL

Vital Farms, Inc.

Farm Products

Revenue, FY25: $759M
Net income: $66.28M
Operating cash flow: $33.72M
Free cash flow: −$48.24M
Net margin: 8.73%
Operating margin: 11.64%
Gross margin: 37.62%

Head-to-head

Filed growth, quality and valuation, read against each company’s own history rather than against the other side.

Metric	ADM	VITL
Revenue growth, latest filed year	−6.15%	+25.26%
Piotroski F-score	5 of 9	2 of 8
P/E against its own history	72.71% above	4033.02% above

What each says it is exposed to

From Item 1A of each company’s most recent 10-K.

ADM

Commodity prices
Export controls
Currency moves
Litigation
Cybersecurity
Tax

And 15 more.

VITL

Commodity prices
Litigation
Data privacy
Supply chain
Cybersecurity
Climate

And 16 more.

Tracked managers holding both

No manager tracked here reports a position in both, as of each company’s latest filed 13F.

Updated Aug 17, 2026 · the newer of the two companies' filings